Defendant Name: Maxwell Technologies Inc.

Defendant Type: Public Company
SIC Code: 3620
CUSIP: 57776710

Initial Case Details

Legal Case Name In the Matter of Maxwell Technologies, Inc., et al.
First Document Date 27-Mar-2018
Initial Filing Format Administrative Action
File Number 3-18408
Allegation Type Issuer Reporting and Disclosure
AAER 3932

Violations Alleged

Exchange Act
Sec 10(b) + Rule 10b-5
Rule 12b-20
Sec 13(a)
Rule 13a-1
Rule 13a-11
Rule 13a-13
Sec 13(b)(2)(B)
Sec 13(b)(5)
Securities Act
Sec 17(a) (Not specified)
Additionally, Van M. Andrews is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Sec 10(b) + Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act.
James W. DeWitt, Jr. is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Rule 12b-20 of the Exchange Act.
David J. Schramm is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Rule 12b-20 of the Exchange Act.
Van M. Andrews is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Rule 12b-20 of the Exchange Act.
James W. DeWitt, Jr. is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Sec 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
David J. Schramm is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Sec 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Van M. Andrews is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Sec 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
James W. DeWitt, Jr. is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Rule 13a-1 of the Exchange Act.
David J. Schramm is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Rule 13a-1 of the Exchange Act.
Van M. Andrews is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Rule 13a-1 of the Exchange Act.
James W. DeWitt, Jr. is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Rule 13a-11 of the Exchange Act.
David J. Schramm is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Rule 13a-11 of the Exchange Act.
Van M. Andrews is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Rule 13a-11 of the Exchange Act.
James W. DeWitt, Jr. is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Rule 13a-13 of the Exchange Act.
David J. Schramm is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Rule 13a-13 of the Exchange Act.
Van M. Andrews is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Rule 13a-13 of the Exchange Act.
James W. DeWitt, Jr. is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act.
David J. Schramm is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act.
Van M. Andrews is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act.
James W. DeWitt, Jr. is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act.
David J. Schramm is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act.
Van M. Andrews is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act.
Van M. Andrews is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Sec 13(b)(5) of the Exchange Act.
Van M. Andrews is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Sec 17(a) (Not specified) of the Securities Act.
Van M. Andrews is alleged to have caused Maxwell Technologies Inc.'s violation of Rules 13b2-1, 13b2-2 Exchange Act.

Resolutions

First Resolution Date 27-Mar-2018
Headline Total Penalty and Disgorgement $2,949,991

Related Documents:

33-10472 27-Mar-2018 Administrative Proceeding
Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order
According to the SEC, "1. From December 2011 through January 2013, Maxwell, a California-based company that develops, manufactures, and markets energy storage and power delivery products, engaged in an accounting fraud scheme that improperly recognized over $19 million in revenue from future quarters in violation of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"). Maxwell, an SEC recidivist, issued materially false and misleading statements about its revenue, revenue growth, and gross margins, and inflated its reported financial results to better meet analysts' expectations. Maxwell did not have sufficient internal accounting controls to identify and properly account for its revenue throughout the relevant period."
2018-48 27-Mar-2018 Press Release--Administrative Proceeding
SEC Charges Energy Storage Company, Former Executive in Fraudulent Scheme to Inflate Financial Results
According to a press released issued on March 27, 2018: the SEC "charged a California-based energy storage and power delivery product manufacturer and one of its former sales executives in a fraudulent revenue recognition scheme designed to inflate the company's reported financial results."
34-83333 25-May-2018 Administrative Proceeding
Order Appointing Tax Administrator
On May 25, 2018, the SEC issued an Order Appointing Tax Administrator in this matter.
34-83727 27-Jul-2018 Administrative Proceeding
Order Appointing Fund Administrator and Setting Administrator Bond Amount
On July 27, 2018, the SEC issued an order appointing a fund administrator and setting the administrator bond amount in the proceedings against Maxwell Technologies, Inc. The SEC ordered that Epiq Systems, Inc. be appointed as the fund administrator, and that the administrator's bond be set at $2,949,991.
34-84296 27-Sep-2018 Administrative Proceeding
Notice of Proposed Plan of Distribution and Opportunity to Comment
The Commission stated: "Notice is hereby given, pursuant to Rule 1103 of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission's ("Commission") Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1103, that the Division of Enforcement has submitted to the Commission a proposed plan of distribution (the "Plan") for the distribution of monies paid by Maxwell Technologies, Inc. ("Maxwell"), Van M. Andrews ("Andrews"), David J. Schramm ("Schramm"), and James W. DeWitt, Jr., CPA ("DeWitt") (collectively, the "Respondents") in settlement of the above-captioned administrative proceeding."
34-84296-pdp 27-Sep-2018 Administrative Proceeding
Proposed Plan of Distribution
The Commission stated: "This proposed Plan of Distribution (the "Plan") has been developed pursuant to Rule 1101 of the Commission's Rules on Fair Fund and Disgorgement Plans ("Rules"), 17 C.F.R. § 201.1101."
34-84531 05-Nov-2018 Administrative Proceeding
Order Approving Plan of Distribution
On November 5, 2018, the SEC ordered the approval of the Distribution Plan. The SEC stated that: "The Distribution Plan proposes to distribute the Fair Fund, less taxes, fees, and expenses, to investors who purchased shares of Maxwell common stock at inflated prices during the period from February 26, 2012 through March 19, 2013, inclusive, and who suffered losses in the value of their investment after disclosures by the Respondents and the resignation of Maxwell's external auditors."
34-84531-dp 05-Nov-2018 Administrative Proceeding
Plan of Distribution
The SEC stated: "The Plan provides for a distribution of the funds collected in the above-referenced proceeding from Maxwell Technologies, Inc. ("Maxwell"), Van M. Andrews ("Andrews"), David J. Schramm ("Schramm"), and James W. DeWitt, Jr. ("DeWitt") (collectively, the "Respondents") to investors who purchased shares of Maxwell common stock on the NASDAQ at inflated prices during the period from February 26, 2012 through March 19, 2013, inclusive ("Recovery Period"), and who suffered losses in the value of their investment subsequent to disclosures by the Respondents."
34-86102 13-Jun-2019 Administrative Proceeding
Order Directing Disbursement of Fair Fund
The SEC stated: "[I]t is hereby ORDERED that the Commission staff shall direct the payment of $2,896,421.42 from the Fair Fund to the Fair Fund's Escrow Account at The Huntington National Bank, and that the Fund Administrator shall distribute such monies to harmed investors as provided for in the Plan."
34-86125 17-Jun-2019 Administrative Proceeding
Order Approving Application of Fund Administrator for Payment of Fees and Expenses and Approval of Future Fees and Expenses
The Commission stated: "[I]t is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 1105(d) of the Commission's Rules, 17 C.F.R. § 201.1105(d), that OFM pay the Fund Administrator's current fees and expenses of $10,078.90 from the Fair Fund."
34-93025 16-Sep-2021 Administrative Proceeding
Order Directing Second Disbursement of Fair Fund
The Commission ordered that: "Commission staff shall transfer $30,644.49 from the Fair Fund to the Fair Fund's escrow account at The Huntington National Bank, and the Fund Administrator shall distribute such monies, along with $47,194.60 held at The Huntington National Bank, for a total distribution of $78,635.72 by the Fund Administrator to Eligible Claimants in accordance with the Plan."
34-99587 22-Feb-2024 Administrative Proceeding
Order Authorizing the Transfer to the U.S. Treasury of any Funds Returned to the Fair Fund in the Future, Discharging the Fund Administrator, Canceling the Fund Administrator's Bond, and Terminating the Fair Fund
The Commission ordered that: "A. Any funds returned to the Maxwell Fair Fund in the future shall be transferred to the U.S. Treasury . . . ; B. The Fund Administrator is discharged; C. The Fund Administrator’s bond is canceled; and D. The Maxwell Fair Fund is terminated."

Other Defendants in Action: