Defendant Name: McDonald's Corporation

Defendant Type: Public Company

Document Reference: 2023-4

Document Details

Legal Case Name In the Matter of Stephen J. Easterbrook and McDonald's Corporation
Document Name SEC Charges McDonald's Former CEO for Misrepresentations About His Termination
Document Date 09-Jan-2023
Document Format Administrative Proceeding
File Number 3-21269
Allegation Type Issuer Reporting and Disclosure
Document Summary The SEC stated that: "[It] charged Stephen J. Easterbrook, former CEO of McDonald’s Corporation, with making false and misleading statements to investors about the circumstances leading to his termination in November 2019. McDonald’s also was charged for shortcomings in its public disclosures related to Easterbrook’s separation agreement."

Disgorgement & Penalty Information

Resolutions
Cease and Desist Order
Cooperation Before the Resolution
Remedial Acts or Efforts Before the Resolution

Related Documents:

33-11144 09-Jan-2023 Administrative Proceeding
Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-a-Desist Order
On January 9, 2023, the SEC instituted cease-and-desist proceedings against Stephen J. Easterbrook and McDonald's stating: "McDonald’s terminated its former CEO, Stephen J. Easterbrook, after finding that he had exercised poor judgment and engaged in an inappropriate personal relationship with a McDonald’s employee in violation of corporate policy. . . . In its Definitive Proxy Statement filed after Easterbrook’s separation, McDonald’s disclosed that it had terminated Easterbrook “without cause” and described the terms of his separation agreement, including, among other things, his right to certain unvested equity-based compensation. In violation of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-3 thereunder, McDonald’s failed to disclose that it exercised discretion in terminating Easterbrook “without cause” under the relevant compensation plan documents after finding that he violated corporate policy, allowing Easterbrook to retain certain equity-based compensation that would have been forfeited if the company had terminated him for cause."

Other Defendants in Action: