Defendant Name: Uni-Pixel, Inc.

Defendant Type: Public Company

Document Reference: LR-23484

Document Details

Legal Case Name SEC v. Reed J. Killion, et al.
Document Name SEC: Tech Company Misled Investors About Key Product
Document Date 10-Mar-2016
Document Format Civil Proceeding
Case Number 16-cv-00621
Federal District Court Texas, Southern District of Texas
Allegation Type Issuer Reporting and Disclosure
Document Summary On March 10, 2016, the SEC announced that "a developer of technologies for touchscreen devices has agreed to pay $750,000 to settle charges that it misled investors about the production status and sales agreements for a key product."

Disgorgement & Penalty Information

Resolutions
Enjoinment

Related Documents:

comp-pr2016-45 09-Mar-2016 Complaint
Complaint
In the Complaint, the SEC alleged that: "Between December 7, 2012 and February 26, 2014 ('Relevant Period'), Uni-Pixel and its CEO, Reed J. Killion, and CFO, Jeffrey W. Tomz, made materially misleading statements and omissions about the Company's touch screen manufacturing technologies, including that it had shipped 50 UniBoss products from its high-volume roll-to-roll manufacturing process when, in fact, it had not."
2016-45 09-Mar-2016 Press Release--Civil Action
SEC: Tech Company Misled Investors About Key Product
On March 9, 2016, the SEC announced that "a developer of technologies for touchscreen devices has agreed to pay $750,000 to settle charges that it misled investors about the production status and sales agreements for a key product."
court_doc10_16-cv-00621 16-Mar-2016 Court Docket Document
Final Judgment as to Defendant Uni-Pixel, Inc.
On March 16, 2016, Federal District Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr. entered final judgment against Uni-Pixel, Inc. pursuant to the consent of Uni-Pixel, Inc.

Other Defendants in Action:

Reed J. Killion
Jeffrey W. Tomz

Related Actions:

Deferred Prosecution Agreement with Bernard Thomas Marren
Bernard Thomas Marren