Defendant Name: Lone Star Value Management LLC

Defendant Type: Subsidiary of Public Company
Public Company Parent: Digirad Corporation
SIC Code: 3845
CUSIP: 25382770

Initial Case Details

Legal Case Name In the Matter of Lone Star Value Management LLC and Jeffrey Eberwein
First Document Date 24-Feb-2020
Initial Filing Format Administrative Action
File Number 3-19706
Allegation Type Investment Advisers/Investment Companies

Violations Alleged

Other
Sections 206(3), 206(4) Advisers Act; Rule 206(4)-7 Advisers Act
Additionally, Jeffrey Eberwein is alleged to have caused Lone Star Value Management LLC's violation of Sections 206(3), 206(4) Advisers Act; Rule 206(4)-7 Advisers Act.

Resolutions

First Resolution Date 24-Feb-2020

Related Documents:

IA-5448 24-Feb-2020 Administrative Proceeding
Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings, Pursuant to Sections 203(e) and 203(k) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order
On February 24, 2020, the SEC instituted settled administrative and cease-and-desist proceedings against Lone Star Value LLC and Jeffrey Eberwein. The SEC stated: "In August 2014 and November 2014, Lone Star, while reporting to the Commission as an exempt reporting investment adviser, effected 19 interfund cross trades between two funds Lone Star managed, and, in June 2015, while registered with the Commission as an investment adviser, effected 2 trades between a fund Lone Star managed and a separately managed account (the "SMA") for which Lone Star served as an investment adviser. These 21 trades were made on a principal basis because Eberwein's ownership stake in the Lone Star fund involved in each of these trades was more than 35% during the relevant time period. Lone Star failed to disclose in writing that it engaged in these principal transactions and did not obtain client consent before the completion of each of the transactions as required under Section 206(3) of the Advisers Act. . . . Lone Star also failed to implement written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations of the Advisers Act and the rules thereunder, a violation of Section 206(4) of the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)-7 thereunder."

Other Defendants in Action: