Defendant Name: Comverse Technology, Inc.

Defendant Type: Public Company
SIC Code: 3661
CUSIP: 20586240

Initial Case Details

Legal Case Name SEC v. Comverse Technology, Inc.
First Document Date 18-Jun-2009
Initial Filing Format Civil Proceeding
Case Number 09-cv-02588
Allegation Type Issuer Reporting and Disclosure
Federal District Court New York, Eastern District of New York

Violations Alleged

Exchange Act
Sec 10(b) + Rule 10b-5
Rule 12b-20
Sec 13(a)
Rule 13a-1
Rule 13a-11
Rule 13a-13
Sec 13(b)(2)(A)
Sec 13(b)(2)(B)
Sec 14(a)
Rule 14a-9
Securities Act
Sec 17(a) (Not specified)

Resolutions

First Resolution Date 18-Jun-2009

Related Documents:

comp21090 18-Jun-2009 Complaint
Complaint
The Commission stated: "Comverse Technology, Inc. ("Comverse" or the "Company") engaged in two separate fraudulent schemes, during the course of more than a decade, to materially misstate its financial condition and performance metrics. The first scheme involved improper backdating of Comverse stock options. The second scheme involved improper accounting practices."
LR-21090 18-Jun-2009 Litigation Release
SEC Sues Comverse Technology, Inc. for Fraudulent Options Backdating and Earnings Management Schemes
The SEC stated that: "[It] filed a settled civil action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against Comverse Technology, Inc. ("Comverse") alleging that it engaged in two separate fraudulent schemes, during the course of more than a decade, to materially misstate its financial condition and performance metrics. According to the Complaint, as a result of its improper conduct, Comverse was able to portray itself as a company with steady, but measured growth, which regularly met analysts' earnings targets."
court_doc2_09-cv-02588 25-Jun-2009 Court Docket Document
Final Judgment as to Defendant Comverse Technology, Inc.
The Court stated: "Defendant Comverse Technology, Inc. ("Defendant" or "Comverse") . . . consented to the Court's jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment"

Related Actions:

SEC v. Jacob "Kobi" Alexander, David Kreinberg, and William F. Sorin
Jacob "Kobi" Alexander
David Kreinberg
William F. Sorin
SEC v. Ulticom, Inc.
SEC v. Lisa M. Roberts
In the Matter of David Kreinberg, CPA
In the Matter of William F. Sorin, Esq.
In the Matter of Lisa M. Roberts, CPA