Defendant Name: Competitive Technologies, Inc.

Defendant Type: Public Company

Document Reference: court_doc218_04-cv-01331

Document Details

Legal Case Name SEC v. Competitive Technologies, Inc., Chauncey D. Steele, John R. Glushko, Thomas C. Kocherhans, Richard A. Kwak, Sheldon A. Strauss, Stephen J. Wilson, and Frank R. McPike
Document Name Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction and Other Relief as to Defendant Competitive Technologies, Inc.
Document Date 26-Oct-2007
Document Format Civil Proceeding
Case Number 04-cv-01331
Federal District Court Connecticut, District of Connecticut
Allegation Type Market Manipulation
Document Summary On October 26, 2007, the Court issued a final judgment as to defendant Competitive Technologies, Inc., stating: "Competitive Technologies, Inc. ("CTT") . . . consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction), waived findings of fact and conclusions of law, and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment."

Disgorgement & Penalty Information

Resolutions
Enjoinment

Related Documents:

complaint_04-cv-01331 11-Aug-2004 Complaint
Complaint
The SEC stated: "This case involves a prolonged, multi-faceted scheme to manipulate and inflate the price of CTT stock."
LR-20388 07-Dec-2007 Litigation Release
Jury Trial Results in Verdict Against SEC Defendant. SEC to Retry Case Against Two Others
The Commission stated: "The defendants participated in a scheme to manipulate and inflate the price of CTT's stock from at least July 1998 to June 2001. The complaint alleged that the defendants artificially raised and maintained the price of CTT's stock and created a false or misleading appearance with respect to the market for CTT stock through manipulative practices."
LR-20783 16-Oct-2008 Litigation Release
Litigation Release
The SEC stated: "The Commission's complaint, filed against a total of eight defendants on August 11, 2004, alleged that the defendants participated in a scheme to manipulate and inflate the price of CTT stock from at least July 1998 to June 2001. The complaint alleged that the defendants (which included CTT itself and its former CEO, plus six former registered representatives of broker-dealers) raised and maintained the price of CTT's stock and created a false or misleading appearance with respect to the market for CTT stock through manipulative practices such as placing buy orders at or near the close of the market in order to inflate the reported closing price ("marking the close"), placing successive buy orders in small amounts at increasing prices ("painting the tape"), and using accounts they controlled or serviced to place pre-arranged buy and sell orders in virtually identical amounts (placing "matched trades")."

Related Actions:

In the Matter of John R. Glushko
John R. Glushko