Defendant Name: SCANA Corporation

Defendant Type: Subsidiary of Public Company

Document Reference: court_doc50_20-cv-00882

Document Details

Legal Case Name SEC v. SCANA Corporation, Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc. (f/k/a South Carolina Electric & Gas Company), Kevin B. Marsh, and Stephen A. Byrne
Document Name Order and Final Judgment as to Defendants SCANA Corporation and Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.
Document Date 03-Dec-2020
Document Format Civil Proceeding
Case Number 20-cv-00882
Federal District Court South Carolina, District of South Carolina
Federal District Judge Mary Geiger Lewis
Allegation Type Issuer Reporting and Disclosure
Document Summary On December 3, 2020, the Court issued a final judgment as to SCANA Corporation stating that defendant "consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendants and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment"

Disgorgement & Penalty Information

Resolutions
Enjoinment
Monetary Penalties:

Disgorgement

Individual:     Shared:     $112,500,000.00
Shared with: Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc. Note that the amount of $112,500,000.00 includes also pre-judgment interest

Civil Penalty

Individual:     $25,000,000.00 Shared:    

Pre-Judgment Interest

(Penalty was noted in document, but no amount was listed)

Related Documents:

comp24751 27-Feb-2020 Complaint
Complaint
The SEC stated: "This case arises out of a historic securities fraud perpetrated by senior executives at SCANA Corporation and its subsidiary South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (“SCE&G”) (jointly referred to as “SCANA”). SCANA and its senior executives repeatedly deceived investors, regulators, and the public over several years about the status of a $10 billion nuclear energy project. When the truth was revealed, it resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in losses to SCANA’s investors and to South Carolinians."
LR-24751 27-Feb-2020 Litigation Release
Litigation Release
The SEC stated that: "[It] charged SCANA Corp., two of its former top executives, and South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. (SCE&G), now known as Dominion Energy South Carolina Inc., with defrauding investors by making false and misleading statements about a nuclear power plant expansion that was ultimately abandoned."
2020-44 27-Feb-2020 Press Release--Civil Action
SEC Charges South Carolina Energy Companies, Former Executives With Defrauding Investors
The SEC stated that: "[It] charged SCANA Corp., two of its former top executives, and South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. (SCE&G), now known as Dominion Energy South Carolina Inc., with defrauding investors by making false and misleading statements about a nuclear power plant expansion that was ultimately abandoned."
2020-301 02-Dec-2020 Press Release--Civil Action
Energy Companies Agree to Settle Fraud Charges Stemming From Failed Nuclear Power Plant Expansion
The SEC announced that: "SCANA Corp. and its subsidiary South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. (SCE&G) have agreed to settle the SEC's lawsuit charging them with defrauding investors by making false and misleading statements about a nuclear power plant expansion that was ultimately abandoned. The proposed settlement, which remains subject to court approval, would require SCANA to pay a $25 million penalty, and SCANA and SCE&G to pay $112.5 million in disgorgement plus prejudgment interest."
LR-24976 03-Dec-2020 Litigation Release
Litigation Release
The SEC announced that: "SCANA Corp. and its subsidiary South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. (SCE&G) have agreed to settle the SEC's lawsuit charging them with defrauding investors by making false and misleading statements about a nuclear power plant expansion that was ultimately abandoned. The proposed settlement, which remains subject to court approval, would require SCANA to pay a $25 million civil penalty, and SCANA and SCE&G to pay $112.5 million in disgorgement plus prejudgment interest."