Defendant Name: China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited

Defendant Type: Public Company
SIC Code: 1311
CUSIP: 16941G10

Initial Case Details

Legal Case Name SEC v. China North East Petroleum Holdings Limited; Wang Hongjun; Ju Guizhi; and Jiang Chao, Defendants, Jiang Mingfu; and Sun Jishuang, Relief Defendants
First Document Date 29-Nov-2012
Initial Filing Format Civil Proceeding
Case Number 12-cv-08696
Allegation Type Issuer Reporting and Disclosure
Federal District Court New York, Southern District of New York

Violations Alleged

Exchange Act
Sec 10(b) + Rule 10b-5
Sec 13(a)
Rule 13a-1
Rule 13a-11
Rule 13a-13
Sec 13(b)(2)(A)
Sec 13(b)(2)(B)
Sec 13(b)(5)
Securities Act
Sec 17(a) (Not specified)
Other
Rule 13b2-1 Exchange Act
Additionally, Hongjun Wang is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 10(b) + Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Hongjun Wang is alleged to have controlled China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 10(b) + Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act.
Guizhi Ju is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 10(b) + Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Guizhi Ju is alleged to have controlled China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 10(b) + Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act.
Chao Jiang is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 10(b) + Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Hongjun Wang is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(a) of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Hongjun Wang is alleged to have controlled China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Guizhi Ju is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(a) of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Guizhi Ju is alleged to have controlled China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Chao Jiang is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(a) of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Hongjun Wang is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-1 of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Hongjun Wang is alleged to have controlled China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-1 of the Exchange Act.
Guizhi Ju is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-1 of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Guizhi Ju is alleged to have controlled China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-1 of the Exchange Act.
Chao Jiang is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-1 of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Hongjun Wang is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-11 of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Hongjun Wang is alleged to have controlled China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-11 of the Exchange Act.
Guizhi Ju is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-11 of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Guizhi Ju is alleged to have controlled China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-11 of the Exchange Act.
Chao Jiang is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-11 of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Hongjun Wang is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-13 of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Hongjun Wang is alleged to have controlled China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-13 of the Exchange Act.
Guizhi Ju is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-13 of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Guizhi Ju is alleged to have controlled China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-13 of the Exchange Act.
Chao Jiang is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Rule 13a-13 of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Hongjun Wang is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Hongjun Wang is alleged to have controlled China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act.
Guizhi Ju is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Guizhi Ju is alleged to have controlled China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act.
Chao Jiang is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Hongjun Wang is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Hongjun Wang is alleged to have controlled China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act.
Guizhi Ju is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).
Guizhi Ju is alleged to have controlled China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act.
Chao Jiang is alleged to have aided and abetted China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Limited's violation of Sec 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act (willfully/knowingly).

Resolutions

First Resolution Date 13-Jul-2015

Related Documents:

comp22552 29-Nov-2012 Complaint
Complaint
On November 29, 2012, the SEC filed a complaint against the company. The SEC alleged that China North East Petroleum Holdings Limited in two public offerings stated to investors that offering proceeds would be used "to fund future business expansion and for general working capital purposes." Instead, the SEC alleged that that the proceeds were diverted "to corporate insiders and their family members in a manner that was neither disclosed to investors nor consistent with [China North's] representations to investors concerning the intended and permissible uses of the offering proceeds." The SEC also alleged that defendants engaged in fraudulent conduct in connection with "at least 176 undisclosed, related party transactions."
LR-22552 30-Nov-2012 Litigation Release
SEC Files Fraud Charges Against China North East Petroleum Holdings Limited; Its CEO, President and Former Chairman; Its Founder and Former Director; and Its Vice President and Secretary
On November 30, 2012, the SEC issued a litigation release, announcing that it filed a complaint against the company. The SEC alleged that China North East Petroleum Holdings Limited in two public offerings stated to investors that offering proceeds would be used "to fund future business expansion and for general working capital purposes." Instead, the SEC alleged, the proceeds were diverted "to corporate insiders and their family members in a manner that was neither disclosed to investors nor consistent with [China North's] representations to investors concerning the intended and permissible uses of the offering proceeds." The SEC also alleged that defendants engaged in fraudulent conduct in connection with "at least 176 undisclosed, related party transactions."
court_doc128_12-cv-08696 13-Jul-2015 Court Docket Document
Clerk's Certificate Noting Defaults as to Defendants China North East Petroleum Holdings Limited and Wang Hongjun (a/k/a Hongjun Wang)
By Order dated November 20, 2014, the Court permitted China North East Petroleum (CNEP)'s counsel to withdraw and ordered CNEP to retain new counsel or face the entry of a default judgment. On July 13, 2015, the Clerk of Court noted that more than thirty days have elapsed since the Order and noted the entry of default judgment against CNEP and Wang Hongjun.

Other Defendants in Action:

Related Actions:

In the Matter of Baker Tilly Hong Kong Limited, Andrew David Ross, CPA, and Kwok Laiha Helena, CPA