Defendant Name:
        
        United Development Funding IV
    
    Defendant Type:
    
        Public Company
    
   
        SIC Code:
        
            9999
        
    
    
        CUSIP:
        
            91018710
        
    
    
        
            Document Reference:
        
        LR-24185
    
    Document Details
    
    
        
            Legal Case Name
        
        SEC v. United Development Funding III, LP, United Development Funding IV, Hollis M. Greenlaw, Benjamin L. Wissink, Theodore F. Etter, Cara D. Obert, and David A. Hanson
    
    
        
        
            Document Name
        
        
            SEC Charges Real Estate Investment Funds and Executives for Misleading Investors
        
    
    
        
        
            Document Date
        
        
            03-Jul-2018
        
    
    
    
        
        
            Document Format
        
        
            Civil Proceeding
        
    
    
    
        
            
                Case Number
            
            
                18-cv-01735
            
        
            
                
                    Federal District Court
                
                
                    Texas, Northern District of Texas
                
            
             
    
    
        
            Allegation Type
        
        
            
            Issuer Reporting and Disclosure
        
    
 
    
        
            Document Summary
        
        
            On July 3, 2018, the SEC issued a litigation release regarding its charges against United Development Funding IV, stating: "According to the SEC's complaint, Texas-based United Development Funding (UDF) is a family of private and publicly-traded investment funds that deploys investor capital as loans to homebuilders and land-developers. UDF allegedly solicited investors by advertising annualized returns of up to 9.75 percent as well as regular distributions. According to the complaint, for almost five years, UDF did not tell investors that it lacked the monthly cashflow at times to cover investor distributions in one of its older funds, UDF III. Instead, to pay these distributions, the newer UDF IV fund loaned money to developers who had also borrowed money from UDF III. Rather than using those funds for development projects that were underwritten by UDF IV, UDF directed the developers to use the loaned money to pay down their older loans from UDF III."  
        
    
 
    
    
        Disgorgement & Penalty Information
        
        
             
        
    
            
    
    
        Other Defendants in Action: