Defendant Name:
        
        Grander Holdings, Inc.
    
    Defendant Type:
    
        Other
    
    
        
            Document Reference:
        
        court_doc225_18-cv-08175
    
    Document Details
    
    
        
            Legal Case Name
        
        SEC v. Barry C. Honig, John Stetson, Michael Brauser, John R. O'Rourke III, Mark Groussman, Phillip Frost, Robert Ladd, Elliot Maza, Brian Keller, John H. Ford, Alpha Capital Anstalt, ATG Captial LLC, Frost Gamma Investments Trust, GRQ Consultants, Inc., HS Contrarian Investments, LLC, Grander Holdings, Inc., Melechdavid, Inc., Opko Health, Inc., Southern Biotech, Inc., and Stetson Capital Investments Inc.
    
    
        
        
            Document Name
        
        
            Final Judgment as to Defendant Grander Holdings, Inc.
        
    
    
        
        
            Document Date
        
        
            06-Mar-2020
        
    
    
    
        
        
            Document Format
        
        
            Civil Proceeding
        
    
    
    
        
            
                Case Number
            
            
                18-cv-08175
            
        
            
                
                    Federal District Court
                
                
                    New York, Southern District of New York
                
            
                    
                
                    Federal District Judge
                
                
                    Edgardo Ramos
                
            
     
    
    
        
            Allegation Type
        
        
            
            Market Manipulation
        
    
 
    
    
        Disgorgement & Penalty Information
        
        
            
                Resolutions
            
                
                    
                        Enjoinment
                    
                
                
                    
                        "Defendant is permanently barred from participating in an offering of penny stock . . . Defendant is permanently prohibited from, directly or indirectly: (a) holding any beneficial ownership in any issuer of Penny Stock that amounts to greater than 4.99 percent of that issuer’s outstanding stock . . . (b) advertising, marketing, or otherwise promoting any issuer of Penny Stock; causing the advertising, marketing or promotion of any issuer of Penny Stock; or deriving compensation from the advertising, marketing or promotion of any issuer of Penny Stock; (c) exercising control, including the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies, of any issuer of Penny Stock; and (d) providing funding to any issuer of Penny Stock, except funding that results in the issuance of debt securities with no current or future equity conversion feature; provided, however, that . . . nothing herein shall prohibit Defendant from holding or selling the securities of any issuer of Penny Stock whose securities are owned by Defendant as of the date of this Judgment, so long as any sale by Defendant of any such securities, at such time as Defendant’s direct or indirect beneficial ownership exceeds 4.99 percent of that issuer’s outstanding stock."
                    
                
         
             
        
    
            
    
    
        Other Defendants in Action: